Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.

INTRODUCTION: A recent study reported a 34% mid-term revision rate after M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) for wear-related osteolysis. Here, we aim to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and radiographic characteristics of periprosthetic bony changes and implant failure of the M6-C™ artificial disc. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed radiographic (conventional X-ray, CT scan) and clinical outcomes (EQ-5D-5L, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain) data collected during routine follow-up of patients who underwent CTDR with the M6-C™ between 2011 and 2015. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients underwent CTDR with the M6-C™. Follow-up data were available for 43 patients (54% female, mean age 44 years) with 50 implants and a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (6.5-11 years). Implant failure with the presence of severe osteolysis was identified in 5 (12%) patients who were all male (p = 0.016) and implanted at the C5/6 level (p = 0.11). All failed implants required revision surgery. The overall prevalence of osteolysis was 44% (22/50 implants) and 34% (17/50 implants) for significant heterotopic ossification. Patients with high-grade osteolysis showed higher VAS arm pain (p = 0.05) and lower EQ-5D-VAS health VAS (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We report a lower reoperation rate for failed M6-C™ implants than previously published, but confirmed that osteolysis and heterotopic ossification are common following CTDR with the M6-C™ and may be asymptomatic. Therefore, we strongly recommend ongoing clinical and radiographic monitoring after CTDR with the M6-C™, particularly for male patients implanted at the C5/6 level.

Lead--toxicology and assessment in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite a consistent fall in the number of reported cases of inorganic lead toxicity, lead remains an important toxicant. While much of the pathology caused by lead is known, much remains to be established regarding its mutagenicity and teratogenicity. OBJECTIVE: This article briefly outlines aspects of lead toxicity relevant to general practice, and provides an outline for taking a workplace exposure medical history. DISCUSSION: Recent trends show a continuous decline in the number of lead toxicity cases among workers and nonoccupational cases in adults and children. The protean manifestations of lead toxicity make it difficult for doctors to consider it as a differential diagnosis. A basic understanding of lead toxicology is helpful when assessing its clinical presentation, ordering laboratory tests, advising patients how to avoid workplace exposure, and in understanding why it remains a major concern as a mutagen and teratogen.